205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.65%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 5.08%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.02%
Cost reduction while MU shows 7.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.39%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.68%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.54%
R&D reduction while MU shows 4.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.53%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 0.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.83%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 6.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.00%
Interest expense growth less than half of MU's 51.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.18%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.08%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 5.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
40.47%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.19%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.64%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.35%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.98%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-54.62%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
75.78%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.93%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.95%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.32%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.88%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.13%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.