205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.12%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-7.03%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-16.95%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.50%
Margin decline while MU shows 3.55% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.21%
R&D reduction while MU shows 1.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2925.00%
Other expenses change of 2925.00% while MU maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
45.22%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.37%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-58.44%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.70%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 295.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.45%
Operating income decline while MU shows 26.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.17%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 18.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
433.33%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 40.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-81.61%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 19.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 10.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.75%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 136.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-66.33%
Net income decline while MU shows 24.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.68%
Net margin decline while MU shows 15.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.18%
EPS decline while MU shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.67%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.50%
Share count reduction while MU shows 2.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.49%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 2.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.