205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.16%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-1.50%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.91%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.82%
Margin decline while MU shows 6.06% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.41%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.65%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.10%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.32%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.45%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.19%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
184.17%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
193.43%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-231.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
141.29%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
149.15%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.01%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.12%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.59%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.13%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.13%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.54%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.14% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.06% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.