205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 13.30%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.25%
Cost reduction while MU shows 5.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
14.26%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 68.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.19%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 48.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.16%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-294.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-32.18%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.02%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 2.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.35%
Interest expense growth 1.1-1.25x MU's 3.70%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-12.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
70.42%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.36%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 234.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
129.37%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 85.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
117.17%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 87.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-14.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
135.83%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.29%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 2.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1750.00%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.32%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.63%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 8.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
84.37%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.25%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.36%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.53%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.