205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.47%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MU's 11.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-0.81%
Cost reduction while MU shows 2.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.31%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 51.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.43%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 36.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.40%
R&D reduction while MU shows 5.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.04%
Similar other expenses growth to MU's 200.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
40.81%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 2.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.10%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 2.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.95%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 3.30%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-5.05%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 1789.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.82%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 194.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.84%
Operating income decline while MU shows 747.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 680.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 65.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.48%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 122.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 119.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.77%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 88.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.70%
Net income decline while MU shows 115.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.48%
Net margin decline while MU shows 113.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.08%
EPS decline while MU shows 114.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 114.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.63%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 3.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.