PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.66%
Revenue decline while MU shows 22.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.26%
Cost reduction while MU shows 21.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.81%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 27.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.24%
Margin decline while MU shows 3.82% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.98%
R&D reduction while MU shows 18.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.14%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 4600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.93%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 35.16%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.46%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 23.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.87%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.60%
Operating income decline while MU shows 38.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.80%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 13.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
82.14%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 1421.90%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-16.42%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 3126.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 2531.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.56%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.76%
Net income decline while MU shows 3872.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.96%
Net margin decline while MU shows 3138.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.86%
EPS decline while MU shows 4025.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.86%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 3675.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.91%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.81%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 7.91% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.