205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.61%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.54%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
17.05%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 9.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.06%
Similar margin change to MU's 7.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-4.64%
R&D reduction while MU shows 7.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.33%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 400.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.96%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 4.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.74%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.97%
D&A reduction while MU shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
28.43%
Similar EBITDA growth to MU's 31.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
16.37%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.32%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MU's 57.71%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
28.96%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of MU's 55.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-10.53%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
43.22%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of MU's 78.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
29.78%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MU's 75.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
51.09%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.25%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 104.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
27.08%
Net margin growth below 50% of MU's 100.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.18%
EPS growth below 50% of MU's 102.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.91%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 103.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.93%
Share count reduction while MU shows 1.34% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.91%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.