205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.10%
Revenue decline while MU shows 11.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.17%
Cost reduction while MU shows 9.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.45%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 16.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 4.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.83%
R&D reduction while MU shows 7.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 103.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.08%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 6.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.59%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 9.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.56%
Interest expense growth less than half of MU's 23.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.54%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.69%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.78%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1371.43%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.40%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.69%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 5.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.97%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.16%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 20.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.43%
Net margin growth 50-75% of MU's 28.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MU's 19.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 23.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.51%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.