205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.35%
Revenue decline while MU shows 23.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-1.80%
Cost reduction while MU shows 12.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.52%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 74.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.87%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 41.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.58%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 14.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.58%
Similar operating expenses growth to MU's 11.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.63%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 12.01%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.26%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 2.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.32%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 7.64%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.77%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 64.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.47%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 19.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.08%
Operating income decline while MU shows 1221.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.74%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 1009.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.31%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 21.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.17%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 226.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.87%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 202.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.67%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 933.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.78%
Net income decline while MU shows 205.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.44%
Net margin decline while MU shows 185.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.81%
EPS decline while MU shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.90%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 3.96%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 5.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.