PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Revenue decline while MU shows 10.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.27%
Cost reduction while MU shows 2.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.13%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 19.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 8.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.93%
Similar R&D growth to MU's 3.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 122.89%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 0.47%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-6.06%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 2.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.53%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.44%
D&A reduction while MU shows 4.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.71%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 21.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.09%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.58%
Operating income decline while MU shows 27.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.05%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 15.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1400.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 33.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.36%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 33.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 21.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
139.29%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.23%
Net income decline while MU shows 43.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.62%
Net margin decline while MU shows 30.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.87%
EPS decline while MU shows 42.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.02%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 42.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.30%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.