PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.04%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 10.83%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 0.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.29%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 20.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.75%
Margin decline while MU shows 8.64% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.26%
R&D reduction while MU shows 0.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.51%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x MU's 2.04%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
2.47%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.52%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.23%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x MU's 1.91%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
0.56%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MU's 13.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.48%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 10.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.96%
Operating income decline while MU shows 23.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.98%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 11.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
138.46%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.19%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 20.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.84%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 8.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-84.49%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 342.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
297.09%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 13.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
293.01%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 2.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
294.29%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
297.06%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 10.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.20%
Share count reduction while MU shows 2.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 3.20% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.