205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.81%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.30%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.64%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.81%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.82%
R&D reduction while MU shows 0.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.55%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.35%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.93%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.27%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 7.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.00%
Similar D&A growth to MU's 3.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
4.00%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.16%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.51%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.63%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-212.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.36%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.51%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-25.84%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
9.20%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.21%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.14%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.56%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.