205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.26%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.48%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.32%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 3.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.89%
Margin decline while MU shows 1.80% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.88%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 11.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 25.56%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.28%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 4.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-5.77%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.15%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 4.25%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.38%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.11%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.24%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.51%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 66.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.14%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
Tax expense growth 1.1-1.25x MU's 16.44%. Bill Ackman would demand explanation.
4.09%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.20%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.81%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.33%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.43%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.