205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 10.99%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.33%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 12.09%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.22%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 9.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.11%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.10%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.97%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 7.81%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.16%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 4.54%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
0.10%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MU's 12.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.45%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 0.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.65%
Operating income decline while MU shows 17.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.20%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 6.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
52.38%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of MU's 72.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-0.86%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 19.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.92%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 40.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.17%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 16.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.38%
Net margin decline while MU shows 4.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.21%
EPS growth below 50% of MU's 18.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 17.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.