205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.02%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 1.60%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.92%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-3.26%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 44.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.29%
Margin decline while MU shows 45.48% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.60%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 1.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.17%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.11%
Interest expense growth less than half of MU's 33.71%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.67%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 0.72%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-2.13%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 234.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.15%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 349.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.06%
Operating income decline while MU shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.08%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 33.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 22.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 24.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.93%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 157.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.75%
Net income decline while MU shows 18.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.78%
Net margin decline while MU shows 19.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.53%
EPS decline while MU shows 18.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.07%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 18.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.