PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.20%
Revenue decline while MU shows 17.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.86%
Cost reduction while MU shows 7.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.82%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 91.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.03%
Margin decline while MU shows 93.17% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.91%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 17.52%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.91%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 5.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.64%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 6.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.37%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MU's 2.33%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.42%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.69%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 46.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.54%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 23.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.11%
Operating income decline while MU shows 23.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.58%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 34.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.33%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 67.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.47%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 20.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 32.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.21%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 404.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-19.40%
Net income decline while MU shows 13.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.24%
Net margin decline while MU shows 26.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.33%
EPS decline while MU shows 14.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.46%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 14.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 0.46%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 0.46%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.