205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.47%
Revenue decline while MU shows 13.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.95%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 0.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-6.47%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 49.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.11%
Margin decline while MU shows 31.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.20%
R&D reduction while MU shows 6.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.85%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 6.49%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.27%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 1.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.21%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 1.59%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.81%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 28.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.50%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 20.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.39%
Operating income decline while MU shows 120.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.21%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 93.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.55%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 111.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 85.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.79%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 65.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.53%
Net income decline while MU shows 167.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.35%
Net margin decline while MU shows 134.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.81%
EPS decline while MU shows 166.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.56%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 163.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.11%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.