205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.37%
Revenue decline while ON shows 1.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
25.34%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-66.29%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 87.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-59.21%
Margin decline while ON shows 84.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-59.57%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.57%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.36%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-123.01%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.84%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.44%
Operating income decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.74%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
120.50%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.93%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 136.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 135.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
188.89%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.79%
Net income decline while ON shows 135.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.18%
Net margin decline while ON shows 134.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.00%
EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.12%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.