205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.23%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-4.88%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 87.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.86%
Margin decline while ON shows 84.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.99%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
D&A growth while ON reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-133.33%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.79%
Operating income decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.96%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-133.33%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 136.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 135.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-163.64%
Net income decline while ON shows 135.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.30%
Net margin decline while ON shows 134.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-220.00%
EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-220.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.25%
Diluted share increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.