205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.70%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-33.41%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
171.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 87.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
159.59%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ON's 84.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.90%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.89%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
450.00%
D&A growth while ON reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-560.00%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-530.36%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1233.33%
Operating income decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1173.45%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-366.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-800.00%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 136.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-759.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 135.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-700.00%
Net income decline while ON shows 135.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-664.07%
Net margin decline while ON shows 134.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-445.24%
EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-445.24%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.