205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.37%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 1.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
4.49%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-7.67%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 87.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.80%
Margin decline while ON shows 84.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.77%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.84%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
D&A growth while ON reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-197.22%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-190.35%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-217.14%
Operating income decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-209.81%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-210.00%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 136.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-202.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 135.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
135.71%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-190.74%
Net income decline while ON shows 135.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.02%
Net margin decline while ON shows 134.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.00%
EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.49%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.49%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.