205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.86%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
13.34%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.08%
Margin decline while ON shows 84.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1800.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-351.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-260.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3225.23%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 133.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2926.88%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 133.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3232.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 133.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2933.56%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 133.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-32004.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.06%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ON's 136.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 135.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.00%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.90%
Net income decline while ON shows 135.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.08%
Net margin decline while ON shows 134.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.50%
EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.38%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
16.37%
Diluted share increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.