205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.10%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.19%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.33%
Margin decline while ON shows 84.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.79%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.40%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
D&A growth while ON reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.39%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ON's 133.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.52%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ON's 133.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-185.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ON's 136.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 135.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.58%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.96%
Net income growth below 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.72%
Net margin decline while ON shows 134.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.56%
EPS growth below 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.59%
Share count increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.84%
Diluted share increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.