205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.33%
Revenue growth below 50% of ON's 1.59%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.22%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 87.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.25%
Margin decline while ON shows 84.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
90.64%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.03%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.54%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.50%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-542.50%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-541.03%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.58%
Operating income decline while ON shows 133.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.14%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 133.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-244.57%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 136.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-244.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 135.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.25%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-293.42%
Net income decline while ON shows 135.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-292.78%
Net margin decline while ON shows 134.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.42%
EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.42%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 135.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.10%
Share count increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.51%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.