205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.99%
Revenue decline while ON shows 3.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.94%
Cost reduction while ON shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.87%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.98%
R&D growth less than half of ON's 13.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ON's 13.25%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.71%
Total costs reduction while ON shows 9.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.80%
D&A growth above 1.5x ON's 10.31%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-10.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.97%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 7.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-19.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.41%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-12.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.26%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.28%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.79%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.