205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.41%
Revenue growth below 50% of ON's 33.37%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.67%
Cost growth less than half of ON's 34.80%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.40%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 30.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.06%
R&D reduction while ON shows 67.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 56.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.15%
Total costs growth less than half of ON's 40.13%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
D&A growth less than half of ON's 33.91%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
2.84%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ON's 26.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.41%
EBITDA margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of ON's 8.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.79%
Operating margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-48.48%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.19%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ON's 24.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.19%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Net income decline while ON shows 64.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.27%
Net margin decline while ON shows 23.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
EPS decline while ON shows 32.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.20%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 19.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.53%
Share count reduction while ON shows 29.47% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.52%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 31.20% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.