205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.26%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.18%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-26.53%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.44%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.66%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 2.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-23.97%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.95%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.09%
D&A reduction while ON shows 3.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.27%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 106.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.54%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ON's 35.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.00%
Operating income decline while ON shows 99.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.12%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 98.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
135.71%
Other expenses change of 135.71% while ON maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-58.33%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 94.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.24%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 93.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
97.18%
Tax expense growth less than half of ON's 242.86%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-84.11%
Net income decline while ON shows 93.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while ON shows 91.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
EPS decline while ON shows 93.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 93.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.47%
Share count reduction while ON shows 2.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.62%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 2.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.