205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.77%
Revenue decline while ON shows 50.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.54%
Cost growth less than half of ON's 83.90%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.59%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 2.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.65%
R&D growth less than half of ON's 53.37%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.41%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ON's 22.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
28.13%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of ON's 43.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
8.24%
Total costs growth less than half of ON's 72.41%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.44%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 369.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.44%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 18.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-29.30%
Net income decline while ON shows 22.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.11%
EPS decline while ON shows 21.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.57%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 14.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.43%
Share count reduction while ON shows 1.71% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.42%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ON's 3.68%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.