205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.95%
Revenue growth below 50% of ON's 4.04%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.46%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 1.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
1.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ON's 9.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Margin decline while ON shows 5.51% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.47%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
550.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ON's 17.53%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.41%
Similar operating expenses growth to ON's 3.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.78%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 2.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.16%
D&A reduction while ON shows 17.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.70%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 105.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 28.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.33%
Operating income decline while ON shows 74.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 67.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.95%
Tax expense reduction while ON shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.90%
Net income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.79%
EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.94%
Share count reduction while ON shows 1.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.17%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 1.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.