PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.33%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
8.71%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-11.24%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.04%
Margin decline while ON shows 7.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
20.00%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.27%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ON's 3.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
27.20%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.20%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.00%
Interest expense growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.90%
D&A growth less than half of ON's 490.57%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-31.34%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 689.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.42%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 90.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.16%
Operating income decline while ON shows 555.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.56%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 632.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.07%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-50.42%
Net income decline while ON shows 13.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
EPS decline while ON shows 14.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.02%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 16.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.70%
Share count reduction while ON shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 2.63% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.