205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.74%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-15.06%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-1.10%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 2.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.38%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x ON's 5.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
7.38%
R&D growth above 1.5x ON's 0.77%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.49%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 0.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.14%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 0.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.90%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.57%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ON's 68.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.30%
EBITDA margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.77%
Operating income growth below 50% of ON's 42.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.19%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ON's 47.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-105.88%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 87.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.02%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ON's 183.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.99%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ON's 186.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
94.00%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of ON's 156.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-11.07%
Net income decline while ON shows 166.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.55%
Net margin decline while ON shows 168.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.54%
EPS decline while ON shows 163.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 165.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.62%
Share count reduction below 50% of ON's 0.49%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.04%
Diluted share change of 1.04% while ON is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.