PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.86%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.91%
Cost increase while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.84%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 5.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.92%
Margin expansion below 50% of ON's 5.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.70%
R&D reduction while ON shows 7.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.22%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.14%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.48%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.61%
D&A reduction while ON shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
29.49%
Similar EBITDA growth to ON's 34.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
21.18%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 9.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.63%
Operating income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.96%
Operating margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.14%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.12%
Pre-tax income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.02%
Tax expense growth less than half of ON's 75.61%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
68.30%
Net income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.50%
Net margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.22%
EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.73%
Diluted EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.26%
Share count reduction while ON shows 0.44% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.94%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.