205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 3.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-0.81%
Cost reduction while ON shows 2.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.31%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 7.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.43%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ON's 3.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.40%
R&D reduction while ON shows 1.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.04%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.81%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.10%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ON's 0.92%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.95%
D&A growth while ON reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.05%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 20.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.84%
Operating income decline while ON shows 32.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 27.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.48%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 23.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 18.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.77%
Tax expense reduction while ON shows 261.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.70%
Net income decline while ON shows 8.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.48%
Net margin decline while ON shows 4.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.08%
EPS decline while ON shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.