205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.64%
Revenue decline while ON shows 0.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.91%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.17%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 8.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.55%
Margin decline while ON shows 7.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.68%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.27%
Other expenses growth less than half of ON's 260.87%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.92%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.06%
Total costs growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
D&A reduction while ON shows 213.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.03%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 152.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 156.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.91%
Operating income decline while ON shows 240.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.62%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 237.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.46%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 49.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.52%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 586.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 581.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.40%
Tax expense growth less than half of ON's 111.43%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-20.48%
Net income decline while ON shows 1024.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.48%
Net margin decline while ON shows 1015.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.48%
EPS decline while ON shows 1060.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.74%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 1071.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.19%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.