205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.10%
Revenue decline while ON shows 32.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.17%
Cost reduction while ON shows 40.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.45%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 16.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
Margin expansion while ON shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.83%
R&D reduction while ON shows 25.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.08%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 24.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.59%
Total costs reduction while ON shows 36.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.56%
Interest expense growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.54%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ON's 78.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.69%
EBITDA margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.45%
Operating income decline while ON shows 19.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.78%
Operating margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1371.43%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.40%
Pre-tax income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.69%
Pre-tax margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.97%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.16%
Net income growth below 50% of ON's 998.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.43%
Net margin growth below 50% of ON's 728.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.00%
EPS growth below 50% of ON's 1250.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ON's 1200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.51%
Share count reduction while ON shows 0.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.