205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.27%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.13%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
Margin expansion while ON shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.93%
R&D growth 50-75% of ON's 4.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of ON's 57.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 0.71%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-6.06%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
10.53%
Interest expense growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.71%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1400.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.29%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.23%
Net income decline while ON shows 387.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.62%
Net margin decline while ON shows 392.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.87%
EPS decline while ON shows 380.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.02%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 388.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.30%
Share count reduction while ON shows 0.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 1.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.