PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.79%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ON's 9.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
4.84%
Cost growth 50-75% of ON's 8.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
7.87%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ON's 12.78%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.01%
Margin expansion below 50% of ON's 2.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.52%
R&D growth less than half of ON's 2.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.30%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 2.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.49%
Total costs growth less than half of ON's 6.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.04%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.80%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
17.60%
Similar EBITDA growth to ON's 20.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.13%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 3.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.68%
Operating income growth below 50% of ON's 41.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.52%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ON's 28.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
618.18%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.42%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ON's 54.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.71%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ON's 40.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.14%
Tax expense growth less than half of ON's 136.94%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.76%
Net income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.83%
Net margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.49%
EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.14%
Diluted EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of ON's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ON's 3.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.