205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.23%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 2.45%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.34%
Cost growth above 1.5x ON's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.71%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 4.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.46%
Margin expansion below 50% of ON's 2.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.52%
R&D reduction while ON shows 8.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.00%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ON's 8.53%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.84%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x ON's 3.09%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.82%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.36%
EBITDA growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.95%
Operating income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.64%
Operating margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.62%
Pre-tax income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.18%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
3.85%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.83%
EPS change of 3.83% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
3.89%
Diluted EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of ON's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ON's 3.20%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.