205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of ON's 5.16%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.33%
Cost growth less than half of ON's 8.25%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.22%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 2.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.11%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.10%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.97%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ON's 4.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
8.16%
Interest expense growth 1.1-1.25x ON's 7.24%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
9.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x ON's 0.87%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
0.10%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ON's 4.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.38%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ON's 11.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-0.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.17%
Net income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.21%
EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.75%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 0.38% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.