205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.95%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.95%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.95%
Other expenses change of 6.95% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.95%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.57%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.95%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-383.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-364.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-383.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-364.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
383.16%
Other expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 1366.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.00%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.65%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.51%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.51%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.