205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.36%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.36%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.36%
Other expenses change of 8.36% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.36%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.57%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.36%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-371.30%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-350.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-371.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-350.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
371.30%
Other expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 1366.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.50%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.89%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.33%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.33%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.