205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.70%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.86%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-33.41%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
171.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
159.59%
Margin change of 159.59% while QCOM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.90%
Operating expenses change of 181.90% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
6.89%
Total costs change of 6.89% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
450.00%
D&A change of 450.00% while QCOM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-560.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-530.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1233.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1173.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-366.67%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 537.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-800.00%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-759.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% while QCOM maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-700.00%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-664.07%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-445.24%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-445.24%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count change of 0.04% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.