PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.31%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 11.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
52.89%
Cost growth of 52.89% while QCOM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-58.24%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 101.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-66.92%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 112.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.09%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 126.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
223.81%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 101.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
228.05%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 101.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
250.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 98.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
255.14%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 99.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
212.50%
Income change of 212.50% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
216.35%
Margin change of 216.35% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-20.69%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
147.06%
Income change of 147.06% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
148.67%
Margin change of 148.67% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
148.23%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 48.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
148.23%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 48.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-29.30%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-29.30%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.