205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.34%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 3.04%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.62%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 33.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.88%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 29.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.36%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 21.74%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.13%
Total costs change of 2.13% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.38%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 650.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 294.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.38%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 53.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 54.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.37%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-19.27%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 58.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.33%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 59.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.22%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 150.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.83%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.88%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 51.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 44.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 44.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.