205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.02%
Revenue growth 50-75% of QCOM's 7.38%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-35.60%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
134.81%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 16.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.59%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 8.53%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
182.39%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.86%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.72%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.59%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 218.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 225.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 257.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 246.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
89.29%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.00%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 60.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 62.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 300.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
35.09%
Income change of 35.09% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
28.63%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 6.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.00%
EPS change of 25.00% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
25.00%
Diluted EPS change of 25.00% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
19.32%
Share count change of 19.32% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
19.32%
Diluted share change of 19.32% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.