205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.86%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 7.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
13.34%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 16.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.08%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 8.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1800.77%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 28.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-351.72%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 10.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-260.00%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3225.23%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2926.88%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3232.57%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2933.56%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-32004.55%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 1100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.06%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of QCOM's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-6.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
38.00%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.90%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 19.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.08%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 11.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.50%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.38%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
16.37%
Diluted share change of 16.37% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.