205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.49%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 26.07%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.84%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 39.47%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.95%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of QCOM's 12.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
4.35%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 13.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.98%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 27.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 22.22%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
39.71%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 14.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.32%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.71%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 9.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.32%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-200.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.78%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 6.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
32.48%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.86%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.31%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 10.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.98%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
EPS change of 33.33% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
33.33%
Diluted EPS change of 33.33% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.82%
Share count change of 0.82% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.55%
Diluted share change of 0.55% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.