205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.55%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 5.76%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.77%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.98%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 19.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.56%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 13.09% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 33.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.93%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 9.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.67%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 15.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.33%
Other expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 81.82%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.44%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.15%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.09%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 16.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.43%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 10.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.33%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.53%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.43%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.