205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.08%
Similar revenue growth to QCOM's 9.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
9.61%
Similar cost growth to QCOM's 9.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
4.16%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 10.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.63%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 0.67% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1883.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-347.83%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-418.18%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 11.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2788.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 65.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2572.37%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 193.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2800.34%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 133.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2583.50%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 112.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-81510.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.21%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 1362.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.25%
Share count change of 0.25% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.