205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.14%
Revenue growth 50-75% of QCOM's 18.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
12.87%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 27.89%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
13.66%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 10.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.46%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.94%
Similar R&D growth to QCOM's 1.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.71%
Similar operating expenses growth to QCOM's 11.29%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
12.59%
Total costs growth 50-75% of QCOM's 19.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.34%
Similar EBITDA growth to QCOM's 12.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-1.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.15%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 4.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.55%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.00%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.82%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.86%
Tax expense change of 11.86% while QCOM maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
20.87%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.83%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
EPS change of 20.00% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
20.00%
Diluted EPS change of 20.00% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.82%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of QCOM's 1.69%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.